Friday, July 13, 2012

The social justices of Monster and Centerfield

  Walter Dean Myers has a fascinating way of going beyond traditional teaching styles.  Monster is a book about a young boy, Steve Harmon, who has been summoned to court to appear as an accomplice to an armed robbery.  Te entire book is written as a movie script because Steve Harmon is interested in movie making and editing.  He told his lawyer that one day he's like to turn this story into a film.
   Rather a quick read, Monster opens young eyes to the harshness of jails and seriousness of court cases.  The lawyers, and attorney Petrocelli, Briggs, and O'Brien, are vivid depictions of men and women in a courtroom.  The story itself is about two men that planned a stickup in a local store.  The owner of the store was by himself, and had a gun for protection.  The two perpetrators had gained control of the gun and shot the owner, Al Nesbitt.
  The story was a bit confusing in how they were giving information because ayers were promising a lesser sentence.  So, Steve Harmon had recognized the men involved, so they had dragged his name into the cops to add another victim to sentence.  But, that day, Steve Harmon was in the drugstore, and did walk out, but was not part of the crime as the others had mentioned.  He did not give a signal that the coast was clear.  He had been pulled into this whole mess because he was at the wrong place at the wrong time.
  The court script was very interesting to read.  Students can get a feel for how lawyers and judges interact with not only each other, but with their own clients.  Though  Steve was found innocent, Ms. O'Brien had never had faith in him.  She consistently said the odds were against them and to prepare for the worst.  Then, when they had won the case, she did not rejoice for her client.  He was not the 'monster' that the court had accused him to be.
   Mock trials are always a stimulating activity to do in the classroom.  I often did them in my sixth grade, and I created various roles for all the students.   We had read a short story about a trial, and the students wanted to try it.  It was a major success and I hope to do it again; this book would be a great follow up read for eighth graders.  I would not go any younger, depending on my students.  Some language and reference to what happens in jail is frightening for adults, let alone kids.  It is a quick read to open a student's mind to our justice system.
 


     In reference to the text, Young Adult Literature in the Classroom, "non fiction books can do more than motivate' they can improve student comprehension of expository text".  I agree with this fully.  Nonfiction has a way of captivating students because it is real.   Real people, real events, and real places have a way of hooking readers in.  It can provide  insightful looks into contemporary issues, and this is a perfect example.  Little detail can be provided in a textbook about the social injustices in New York, yet, Monster can.  Bringing non fiction into the classroom is essential for all students.  On page 95, the text states, "incorporate non fiction during sustained silent readings, and reading nonfiction aloud".   I read Randy Pausch's Last Lecture aloud this past school year, and it was very interesting to the students to follow along.  The whole class read chapters of the text, in small groups.  They read the book together, and then we invited guest speakers into our classroom to offer their own lecture on life's experiences.  These guest speakers really added emphasis to what we had read in class, and to their own lives.
 





Loosely connected, Robert Lipsyte wrote a novel called Centerfield.  Mike is a junior in high school and he is getting ready for an anticipated season playing Varsity center field.  Baseball is all he can think about.  His coach, Coach Cody, is really tough on his players but has brought them to championships.  Mike really respects him, almost as much as his baseball hero, Billy Budd.  Mike's life seems to fall off track when he decides to push a politically opinionated kid at school, Zack.  He knew about the zero tolerance policy at Ridgedale and thought his baseball season was out the window.  Luckily, Cody worked a schedule for him to work with Zack Saturday mornings in Cyber Club.  Little did Mike know he was supervising.
  Mike has inner turmoil against his parents, though he does his best to forgive their absence from his life.  A new store is opening, and they are busy with the finishing touches.   His brother and sister are also absent from his life; his best friend Ryan is there for him.  His girlfriend Lori tries desperately to be the girl for Mike, but he just doesn't see her for him.  A love interest in another character, Kat, develops.  She is mysterious enough to keep Mike on his toes.
  The story unfolds into the baseball season with a student, Oscar, who also plays center field.  He is an amazing player with talent that Mike recognizes, but doesn't want to give up his position.  He soon finds out that Oscar's dad is working for Mike's dad in preparations of the new store.  He knows they are from New York, but doesn't tell coach.  His focus is to please his coach as often as possible, to live up to expectation.  Kat and Mike begin to talk, and become an item towards the end of the book.  She had sent in a video to the Billy Budd website, "Meet and Greet with Billy for the Day" and Mike had won. He found his hero was not what he had envisioned for so long.  The site was created by managers, and Billy was too busy to interact with Mike.
  Next, Coach Cody's true colors came out.  Besides fabricated stories to different groups of kids, Mike and Zack work together to discover he had stolen an identity.  His real name was Roger.  Mike knew he had to get Coach out of their school for manipulating so many lives, including Kat's.  He does just that, with the help of his dad.





   This is a perfect read for eighth grade boys getting ready to enter high school and the realm of sports. It teaches them patience and working as a team.  Dedication to a team is important, and sometimes perseverance pays off.  I would use this as a book club read for boys- and I think they would enjoy it.  The language and vocabulary is easy to follow, and the chapters are relatively short to read through.   The use of dialogue is very good and allows the reader to really view Mike's inner thoughts and actions.  This would be very successful in a book club setting, especially among boys.
    In reference to the textbook, Young Adult Literature in the Classroom, book discussions are essential in understanding.  As Robb states on page 30, "How students read books at school is equally as important as what they read."   I think student engagement and involvement in talking about the book is crucial for understanding.  I like the idea posed on page 33 that states, "During discussions I circulate and listen to snippets of talk.  I carry sticky notes and a pencil, jotting down some of the students' discussion strategies.  Later I will review my notes to see what has worked well."  This is something I look forward to doing in my classroom because as a reflective teacher, I want to make the best learning environment possible.   This will help better engage myself with my students and their understanding.

7 comments:

  1. DR.RIES AND COMMENT ON MONSTER ENTRY.

    Lisa, I believe that the novel "Monster" opens one's eyes to much more than just the "harshness of jail and the seriousness of court cases." From my vantage point I see this as a novel that addresses itself to the seriousness of bad choices and how those bad choices can come back to haunt one. Myers leaves a great deal unsaid in this story, but if you read closely you will see that Steve Harmon was, indeed, part of this hold up. Intertwined throughout this story are a few instances of Steve not "owning up to his faults." P. 43.........Tony, his friend, says, "I didn't throw that rock. You threw it." Steve replied, "I didn't say you threw it. I just said, 'Run.' You should've run."

    Steve wanting to be tough:
    p. 58. Jerry....."you ever want to be a superhero? You know, save people and stuff?"

    Steve......"Sure. You know who I'd want to be? Superman. I'd be wearing glasses and stuff and people would be messing with and then I'd kick butt."
    P. 81......Steve shows that he is also tough. Check p. 130 as well................."It was me, I thought as I tried not to throw up, that I had wanted to be tough like them."
    Do you honestly believe that Steve was not part of this hold-up? Do you honestly believe that he just "happened to be there" when the robbery took place? Please reread pp. 260-263 which is, I believe, at the heart of this story. Steve was, indeed, part of this "getover" but how much punishment should he receive. Students need to grapple with that question and they also need to grapple with the idea of bad decisions that follow one forever. Fortunately, Steve is a juvenile and has an opportunity to "mend his ways" but the question is .....................Will he? The question also is.............does the neighborhood in which he is living enable him to "mend his ways" and that is a discussion that needs to be fostered by you the teacher. Steve does not go to school in the area. He is bright and has been accepted to a school that is a more elitist school. Why has he gone awry? Why has he made the decision that he has? Why is he not totally honest in all situations? What does the term "MONSTER" really mean to him as he hears it over and over and over in his head? This is truly a "coming of age" story and WDM calls upon the reader to fill in a lot of the spaces. You need to piece everything together in order to get the full picture. Please think about some of this things and take the time to reread the pages that I have pointed out. I do NOT believe that you want your students to go away thinking that Steve was an innocent bystander...............he was not.

    There is an old expression..................."No honor among thieves." Does that apply here and how?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After rereading, I do understand your comment from above. He is a bright student, and I lacked to understand his full position in this case. His claim of being in the pharmacy was innocence, yet, he lied to say he was not in the pharmacy at the time of the murder. So I think the term "monster" here really becomes a reflection on how society views him, and how he begins to view himself. The other "monsters" had no qualms in admitting the crime, but doing it for a lesser sentence.
      I also agree there is a lot unsaid, left to the reader's perspective. Which is a good thing, in my opinion, because it allows students to think about the story and internalize their own perspective. SI don't think a clear black and white answer is possible here. If Steve was definitely part of the stickup, why wouldn't he admit it in his own personal entries? Or, if he wasn't part of the stickup, why would these people try to bring him down?
      In reference to the expression, I am unfamiliar with "No honor among thieves", so I cannot provide a valid "yes" or "no" to its application. However, I can discuss with students how honor and the justice system coincide.

      Delete
  2. DR. RIES COMMENTS ON CENTER FIELD REFLECTION:

    Lisa, I think that you have missed talking about a very important theme that permeates throughout this particular book..............namely, are our heroes truly heroes? What do we do when we find out that our heroes have feet of clay?

    Are all coaches honest? What does one do when one realizes that a coach is not truly honest and is treating someone unfairly for personal reasons? You have not elaborated on a very serious baseball indescretion here............that of coaches who bring up young ballplayers from South American countries and lie about the players' ages. Or the coaches/agents who take money from poor families with the promise that they will help their son gain access to baseball teams. This is an issue that Lipsyte touches upon in this book. Are these not serious issues, worthy of discussion? Do you think our students would connect to these issues? What are your feelings about a coach who encourages students to spy on one another? Does that happen in this story?

    Should we not talk about the need for those in power to have ethical standards and a penchant for treating everyone equally? I think you may have missed some of the issues that Lipsyte feels are so important and are so much a part of the sports scene these days.

    Do you see a parallel here in what has happened at Ridgedale High School and what has happened more recently at Penn State? Is there a need for those in leadership positions (coaches in particular) to be "above reproach?" Why? Did the school's administration behave professionally? What do we tell our students when they suspect that those in authority are not totally honest nor are they totally fair?

    And finally, how do we define heroes? Who are our heroes? Does a hero always need to be someone who is in the public eye or can our hero be the person who does his/her job honestly on a daily basis? I think Mike finds out who his hero really is. Talk about that.

    I would like to see you link the knowledge that you gain from the text book to your weekly reflections. Dr. Ries

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I agree there are coaches out there that are wrong, and not in it for the children. Particularly in this story, the school should have been recognized for trying to cover up a scam artist who sole another's identity. I believe if this actually happened, school districts would have a hard time covering it up.
      I am not too familiar with the case at Penn State, frankly because stories that like really disturb me. From my understanding, this is a parallel where two men with power consumed authority and were very selfish. Schools that cover these behaviors should receive serious consequences for their actions.

      To me, when Mike saw his dad walk through the office, he realized who was there for him the whole time. Mike's father had even helped out Coach Cody, but knew his son and his son's reputation was far more important. The money and scholarship were important, but not as important as making things right.

      I do think coaches are still heroes, to many children. I had a swim coach for eight years, that unfortunately passed away a couple weeks ago. His wake and funeral mass had drawn over two thousand people from our little town, to show how many lives had been affected by him. To me, he was a hero to many kids. This is how I would like my students to think about coaches.

      Delete
    2. Also, I have added in textbook connections to both of these texts within the blog.

      Delete
  3. Lisa, I'm glad you referenced the idea of a mock trial for Monster. In my school, our 8th graders read To Kill a Mockingbird and spend months learning about the trial process. Ultimately, they hold their own mock trial where they are given a case and they audition for the different roles: prosecuting attorneys, defense team, witnesses, investigators, defendants, judge. Last year's jury was made up of older siblings of students; the year before we used students from a neighboring school district. Not only do they finesse their skill at constructing organized and logical writing, but ultimately they learn how to craft persuasive closing arguments, which is a big focus in our school because of NJASK.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a creative way to incorporate some rather bland NJASK requirements into the curriculum...........making it very exciting and surely introducing an activity from which students learn a great deal. Students are learning to think logically, organize their writing and develop a persuasive argument in an atmosphere of meaningful competition and excitement. GREAT!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete